Everyone's obsessed with Twilight lately, what with New Moon coming out. And I must admit, I loved the books. I sobbed at the end of every one.The movies, eh, I could care less about. I saw the first one with my mom and sister, and will probably end up at New Moon at some point or another. Bella just does not portray well on screen, especially with Kristen Stewart's interpretation.
So there are people who absolutely love love LOVE Twilight. And there are people who absolutely hate hate HATE it. Mostly the nay-sayers are lame people who haven't even tried to read any of them and are most likely snarky males who are just jealous they don't have the panty-dropping skills that an imaginary vampire does.
But there are nay-sayers who occasionally speak a word of truth about the Twilight series that disturbs me. Twilight is setting up so many tween girls for a life of - best case scenario - disappointment because no man in real life is like the men/vampires/werewolves portrayed in today's media.
Worst case scenario - they end up in a controlling, violent relationship based on "passion," instead of mutual respect, clear communication, sexual attraction and fun & happiness.
So let's go back to the last obnoxious tween book-to-movie series sensation that swept millions - this time of girls AND boys - off their feet. Yes. I'm talking Harry Potter.
I picked the series back up again at book five like eight years later after I put it down after I read book four right after it came out. I kind of remember why I put it down in the first place.

The character who us lovely, budding young ladies are supposed to learn the most from (and I do especially relate to her because of my curly, frizzy hair [like a pre-makeover Anne Hathaway in Princess Diaries] and my, like, totally awesome brains, obviously) is Hermione.
Hermione is respected by the teachers. Hermione is clearly the smartest student at the school. But her supposed best friends reject her ideas and scoff at her warnings on every other page. Ohhh it's just Hermione. Silly Hermione, she always wants to study.
Plus, not nearly enough smart boys are flirting with her, besides a long distance pen pal-ship with some German quidditch dude I think.
(Don't do it Hermione! He isn't geographically available!)
Anyway - hair type and too much homework aside - I've started to get worried. What are these incredibly successful business women (I've got to hand it to Stephenie Meyer and J.K. Rowling for their incredible ideas, their ability to build worlds and their bags and bags of money) teaching us about how to be a female character?

I posed this question to my boyfriend one night (geez, at this point I should really change my blog name to OhMyInterestingThingsMyBoyfriendSays). Why aren't there more popular female heroines? Why aren't they portrayed in a way so that tweens can become obsessive fans over them and intellectuals can agree that they're a good example for young'uns today?

He gave me another example. Wonder Woman, he says, is a top three player in the D.C. Comic universe. She's just as powerful and just as much of a leader as Superman and Batman. However, in our universe, her sales and popularity has been appallingly low, compared to her male counterparts.
(I know I have too many asides in this post as it is - but in light of my recent posts, I feel like I must point out he is not a video-games-and-comic-books-only nerdy guy. He's great. And, like, totally popular. Not a vampire or a wizard, but I did the best I could.)
So anyway, where are the strong women characters? Of our time or others? How come we've come far enough for women to not have to write behind pseudonyms and instead become powerfully popular literary icons? But we haven't come far enough for those women to invent useful female characters?
Do you have any examples to prove me wrong?

4 comments:
To fuel your argument, think of Disney movies--there is always a damsel in distress who needs rescuing by a man, but hardly ever the other way around. Hercules and Mulan have some slight role reversals, which is part of why I like them.
And I will say this about Twilight--I think you were a little hard on the nay-sayers at the beginning. I'm sure the books are INFINITELY better than the dreadful movies, but I don't think all the nay-sayers are poo-pooing on Twilight, I think many of them are miserably confused as to why the MOVIES are so popular when Kristen Stewart is a very strange human being and the poorly made movies lack the depth needed to fuel such a cheese-infused idea (brooding vampires in love), which I'm sure the books do much more successfully than the films.
I also have to say that if you are going to try to make vampires different from what they are more commonly known for, I wouldn't make them sparkle in the sun ... what a weak power. Just another excuse for them to be sexy. After Coppola's film version of Bram Stoker's Dracula, vampires somehow always = sex.
If you want to see some seriously hot vampires, check out The Vampire Diaries - hot, hot hot.
But that's besides the point.
My female literary hero is (and has been for 10 years) is Anne of Green Gables. Maybe it started with the red hair we share, but it was always her own dreams of becoming successful with her writing. She earned her own way by teaching. Yes she had a mostly happily ever after (book 8 does have sad moments) and got the guy, but boys were never her priority. She didn't even realize that he was the one until it was almost too late. For her, family, friends, and school were the most important things, and after a few bumps in the beginning, she was a popular and respected member of her community.
I guess she's not really "fantasy" as mentioned in the blog title, but she's still my literary kindred spirit.
Padme/Queen Amidala kicks ASS in Star Wars...not to mention she's played by Natalie Portman who's a great actress, very beautiful, and likes The Lonely Island. The whole sleeps with (the soon to be)Darth Vader thing may kind of retract from her greatness. But, restores balance to the force he does.
Wow... NERD ALERT. Paragraph One.
I really don't read/follow much fantasy. I'd say Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz is also a good heroine. Keeps her head on straight after a few learning experiences.
The Twilight books have proven, so far, to be better than the movies. However, they were all just bad. I read all the books, because why not? And I rented the first movie on DVD. I don't get the hype. However, I really enjoyed Harry Potter (although the movies also need help). I just felt like they were well written. Twilight - not so much. And I hate to hear my journalist / PR friends talk about how great they are. Seriously? Too bad.
Post a Comment